Prices, Promotions, styles, and availability may vary. Our local stores do not honor online pricing. Prices and availability of products and services are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Lowe's reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted.
Item #1634151 |
Model #321871
Wide rim, finger grips, and a ridged lid make handling easy
Use as directed in microwave, freezer and dishwasher
Measurement lines on containers for exact portion size
General | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color/Finish Family | Clear | Package Quantity | 4 |
Manufacturer Color/Finish | Clear | Shape | Square |
Type | Food storage container | Package Contents | Containers and lids |
Base Material | Plastic | Lid Material | Plastic |
Material | Plastic | ||
Dimensions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Size | Multisize | ||
Features | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Airtight Seal | No | Reusable | Yes |
BPA-Free | Yes | Stackable | Yes |
Dishwasher Safe | Lid and base | Stain Resistant | No |
Disposable | No | Vacuum Seal | No |
Lid(s) Included | Yes | ||
Certifications | |||
|---|---|---|---|
CA Residents: Prop 65 Warning(s) | No | ||
Warranty | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Warranty | 30-day limited | ||
Compatibility | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Freezer Safe | Yes | Microwave Safe | Lid and base |
Oven Safe | No | ||
Miscellaneous | |||
|---|---|---|---|
UNSPSC | 52152000 | ||
Check out the Best Selling Food Storage Containers on Lowes.com
Ratings may include incentivized customer reviews.
The product has a mix of positive and negative feedback. On the positive side, customers appreciate the containers' usefulness for storing small portions of food, their affordability, and their durability. The stackable design and variety of sizes are also seen as beneficial. However, the majority of customers are dissatisfied with the new design, citing poor lid quality that does not seal properly, leading to leaks and spills. Many also dislike the new square shape, preferring the previous rectangular design. Overall, the quality and functionality are viewed as a significant downgrade from the previous version, with customers stating they will not repurchase these products.
Customer review summary generated by AI, including incentivized reviews.Go back to the old square stackable shape
Poor company decision to round the containers. Nothing on the shelves since the change was made
From ziploc.com
THIS SUCKS
WHY RUIN A PERFECTLY GOOD PRODUCT? THE OLD SHAPE/SIZE WAS WAY MORE CONVENIENT.
From ziploc.com
We're sorry to hear about your disappointment with our Ziploc® Containers, Alex. We value your feedback and would like the opportunity to learn more. ...
I miss the old squares
I used to buy the holiday squares or deep squares, also the long rectangles every year for packing cookies in and bringing to people at the holidays. I loved how they stacked efficiently and had a lot of space inside for packing and stacking cookie boxes. These new designs with the really wide lid and extremely tapered and rounded insides are terrible, so much wasted space because the top is so wide compared to the bottom! And the rounded bottoms make it hard to stack things. I suspect a lot of ...
From ziploc.com
This is very useful
This is very useful for my household. I use this to put snall amount of salad or grapes and even cole salw. The covers are sturdy and covers the container without leaving a space. This was a little costly in my country but yet so very handy. Great for work!
From influenster.com
Cracked in the freezer
These are very cheaply made and the lids do not fit comfortaby or at all. I have had to toss 3 out so far. Buyer beware.
From ziploc.com
These new updated containers are a horrible shape
Bring back the old shape. These are horrible and don't fit in lunch boxes. My kids refuse to use them. They are big and bulky. I'm going to have to find another brand now. We were exclusively a Ziploc family. Not anymore.
From ziploc.com
A Ploy to Get Consumers to Buy all New Containers!
I don't need to ask "why" you changed your design and shape, it's always about profits. I've used your Ziplock containers for years, as they became my "Tupperware." They've been a great product that I didn't mind giving away to people with food. I feel extremely frustrated by your new narrow bottom design and I'm here to tell you that I'm replacing all my Ziplock containers with another brand. Yours aren't even usable anymore.
From ziploc.com
Please bring back the old style square!
The new version just does not compare to the old style. Older style wasted less space. Teg also stacked better in the fridge. The new version are just frustrating to use.
From ziploc.com
I've used dozens of these for 2 years with no problems!
I use these and similar (Glad and Rubbermaid) containers for culturing butterfly and moth caterpillars. I have over 200 containers of various sizes, including 30 of the 9-cup size, purchased in several different stores at different times. I have not had any of the problems that others report with the new lid design. I can't help wondering if people are just not being careful to seat the lid properly- but it isn't hard to do. Or perhaps there are counterfeits on the market? In my experience these...
From ziploc.com
0 Questions
Be the first to ask a question
Thanks for your honest feedback! You can be certain your comments have been shared with my team. We'd appreciate the chance to make this right. Give o...